|
Spray
Foam Insulation – Understand the ‘R’ Myth of Insulation Values
One of the fairy tales of our time is the "R-value." The
"R-value" is touted to the American consumer to the point where it has taken a
"chiseled in stone" status. The saddest part of the fairy tale is the R-value by
itself is almost a worthless number.
It is impossible to define an insulation with a single number.
It is imperative we know more than a single "R" number. So why do we allow the
R-value fairy tale to be perpetuated? I don't know. I don't know if anybody
knows. It obviously favors fiber insulation.
Consider the R-value of an
insulation after it has been submersed in water or with a 20 mile per hour wind
blowing through it. Obviously the R-value of fiber insulations would go to zero.
Under the same conditions, the solid insulations would be largely unaffected.
Again R-value numbers are "funny" numbers. They are meaningless unless we know
other characteristics.
None of us would ever buy a piece of property if we knew only
one dimension. Suppose someone offered a property for $10,000 and told you it
was a seven. You would instantly wonder if that meant seven acres, seven square
feet, seven miles square, or what. You would want to know where it was -- in a
swamp, on a mountain, in downtown Dallas. In other words, one number cannot
accurately describe anything. The use of an R-value alone is absolutely
ridiculous. Yet we have Code bodies mandating R-values of 20's or 30's or 40's.
A fiber insulation having an R-value of 25 placed in a house not properly sealed
will allow the wind to blow through it as if there were no insulation. Maybe the
R-value is accurate in the tested material in the lab, but it is not even
remotely part of the real world. We must start asking for some additional
dimensions to our insulation. We need to know its resistance to air penetration,
to free water, and to vapor drive. What is the R-value after it is subjected to
real world conditions?
The R-value is a fictitious number supposed to indicate a
material's ability to resist heat loss. It is derived by taking the "k" value of
a product and dividing it into the number one. The "k" value is the actual
measurement of heat transferred through a specific material.
Test to Determine the R-Value
The test used to produce the "k" value is an ASTM test. This
ASTM test was designed by a committee to give us measurement values that
hopefully would be meaningful. A major part of the problem lies in the design of
the test. The test favors the fiber insulations -- fiberglass, rock wool, and
cellulose fiber. Very little input went into the test for the solid insulations,
such as foam glass, cork, expanded polystyrene or urethane foam.
The test does not account for air movement (wind) or any amount
of moisture (water vapor). In other words, the test used to create the R-value
is a test in non-real-world conditions. For instance, fiberglass is generally
assigned an R-value of approximately 3.5. It will only achieve that R-value if
tested in an absolute zero wind and zero moisture environment. Zero wind and
zero moisture are not real-world. Our houses leak air, all our buildings
leak air, and they often leak water. Water vapor from the atmosphere, showers,
cooking, breathing, etc. constantly moves back and forth through the walls and
ceilings. If an attic is not properly ventilated, the water vapor from inside a
house will very quickly semi-saturate the insulation above the ceiling. Even
small amounts of moisture will cause a dramatic drop in fiber insulation's
R-value -- as much as 50 percent or more.
Vapor Barriers
We are told, with very good reason, that insulation should have
a vapor barrier on the warm side. Which is the warm side of the wall of a house?
Obviously, it changes from summer to winter -- even from day to night. If it is
20 F below zero outside, the inside of an occupied house is certainly the warm
side. During the summer months, when the sun is shining, very obviously the warm
side is the outside. Sometimes the novice will try to put vapor barriers on both
sides of the insulation. Vapor barriers on both sides of fiber insulation
generally prove to be disastrous. It seems the vapor barriers will stop most of
the moisture but not all. Small amounts of moisture will move into the fiber
insulation between the two vapor barriers and be trapped. It will accumulate as
the temperature swings back and forth. This accumulation can become a huge
problem. We have re-insulated a number of potato storages which originally were
insulated with fiberglass having a vapor barrier on both sides. Within a year or
two the insulation would completely fail to insulate. The moisture would get
trapped between the vapor barriers and saturate the fiberglass insulation to the
point of holding buckets of water. Fiber insulation needs ventilation on one
side; therefore, the vapor barrier should go on the side where it will do the
most good.
At very cold
temperatures, when the temperature difference across the attic insulation
reaches a certain critical point, convection within the insulation can reduce
R-value.
Nisson, J.D.
Ned, JLC, "Attic Insulation Problems In Cold Climates" March 1992,
pp. 42-43
We
understand air penetration through the wall of the house. In some homes when the
wind blows, we often can feel it. But what most people, including many
engineers, do not realize is that there are very serious convection currents
that occur within the fiber insulations. These convection currents rotate vast
amounts of air. The air currents are not fast enough to feel or even measure
with any but the most sensitive instruments. Nevertheless, the air is constantly
carrying heat from the underside of the pile of fibers to the top side, letting
it escape. If we seal off the air movement, we generally seal in water vapor.
The additional water often will condense (this now becomes a source of water for
rotting of the structure). The water, as a vapor or condensation, will seriously
decrease the insulation value -- the R-value. The only way to deal with a fiber
insulation is to ventilate. But to ventilate means moving air which also
decreases the R-value.
Air
Penetration
The
filter medium for most furnace filters is fiberglass -- the same spun fiberglass
used as insulation. Fiberglass is used for an air filter because it has less
impedance to the air flow, and it is cheap. In other words, the air flows
through it very readily. It is ironic how we wrap our house in a furnace filter
that will strain the bugs out of the wind as it blows through the house. There
are tremendous air currents that blow through the walls of a typical home. As a
demonstration, hold a lit candle near an electrical outlet on an outside wall
when the wind is blowing. The average home with all its doors and windows closed
has a combination of air leaks equal to the size of an open door. Even if we do
a perfect job of installing the fiber insulation in our house and bring the air
infiltration very close to zero from one side of the wall to the other, we still
do not stop the air from moving through the insulation itself vertically both in
the ceiling and the walls.
Solid Insulations
The
best known solid insulation is expanded polystyrene. Other solid insulations
include cork, foam glass and polyisocyanate or polyisocyanurate board stock. The
latter two being variations of urethane foam. Each of these insulations are
ideally suited for many uses. Foam glass has been used for years on hot and cold
tanks, especially in places where vapor drive is a problem. Cork is of course a
very old standby often used in freezer applications. EPS or expanded polystyrene
is seemingly used everywhere from throw away drinking cups and food containers
to perimeter foundation insulation, masonry insulations, and more. Urethane
board stock is becoming the standard for roof insulation, especially for hot
mopped roofs. It is also widely used for exterior sheathing on many of the new
houses. The R-value of the urethane board stock is of course better than any of
the other solid insulations. All of the solid insulations will perform far
better than fiber insulations whenever there is wind or moisture
involved.
Most
of the solid insulations are placed as sheets or board stock. They suffer from
one very common problem. They generally don’t fit tight enough to prevent air
infiltration. It does not matters how thick these board stocks are if the wind
gets behind it. We see this often in masonry construction where board stock is
used between a brick and a block wall. Unless the board stock is actually
physically glued to the block wall air will infiltrate behind it. In this case
as the air flows through the weep holes in the brick and around the insulation
it is rendered virtually useless. Great care must be exercised in placing the
solid insulations. The brick ties need to be fitted at the joints and then
sealed to prevent air flow behind the insulation.
The
only commonly used solid insulation that absolutely protects itself from air
infiltration is the spray-in-place polyurethane. When it is properly placed
between two studs or against the concrete block wall or wherever, the bonding of
the spray plus the expansion of the material in place will effect a total seal.
This total seal is almost impossible to overestimate. In my opinion most of the
heat loss in the walls of the home have to do with the seal rather than the
insulation.
For
physical reasons, heat does not conduct horizontally nearly as well as it does
vertically. Therefore, if there were no insulation in the walls of the homes,
but an absolute airtight seal, there would not necessarily be a huge difference
in the heat loss. This would not be the case if the insulation was missing from
the ceiling. Air infiltration can most effectively be stopped with
spray-in-place polyurethane. It is the only material (properly applied) that
will fill in the corners, the cripples, the double studs, bottom plates, top
plates, etc. The R-value of a material is of no interest or consequence if air
can get past it.
Anecdotes
During
the 1970s my firm insulated a bunch of new homes in the Snake River Valley of
Idaho with 1.25 inches of spray-in-place polyurethane foam in the walls. In 1970
the popular number for the R-value of one inch of urethane foam was 9.09 per
inch. Using this value, we were putting an R of 1.25 x 9.09 = 11.36 in the
walls. This was much less than the R = 16 claimed by the fiberglass insulators.
Today, using the charts from an ASHRAE book, we would only be able to claim an
R-value for the 1.25 inches of 7.5 to 9. Neither of these numbers make for a
very big R-value. The reality is that the people for whom we insulated their
homes invariably would thank us for the savings in their heat bills. They would
tell us their heating bill was half of their neighbor's. They felt as if they
saved the cost of the polyurethane in one, or at most two, years. This is
anecdotal evidence, I know, but anecdotal evidence is also compelling and very
real in our world. Most of these customers were savvy people. They would not
have paid the extra to get the urethane insulation if it had not been better.
"There is a
problem with loose-fill fiberglass attic insulation is cold climates. It appears
that, as attic temperature drops below a certain point, air begins to circulate
into and within the insulation, forming "convective loops" that increase heat
loss and decrease the effective R-value. At very cold temperatures (-20F), the
R-value may decrease by up to 50%."
In full-scale
attic tests at Oak Ridge national Laboratory, the R-value of 6 inches of cubed
loose-fill attic insulation progressively fell as the attic air temperature
dropped. At -18 F, the R-value measured only R-9. The problem seems to occur
with any low-density, loose-fill fibrous insulation.
Nisson, J.D.
Ned, JLC, "Attic Insulation Problems In Cold Climates" March 1992,
pp 42-43
About
mid 1975 I received a call from a division manager of one of the major
fiberglass insulation manufacturers. The caller asked, "I understand that you
are spraying polyurethane in the walls of homes?" I told him that was true. He
was calling because we were cutting into the fiberglass insulation sales in our
area. He asked, "How can you do it?"
I knew
what he meant. He wanted to know how I could look somebody in the eye and sell
them a more expensive insulation than the cheap old fiberglass. I told him the
way I did it is with a spray gun. Of course, that wasn't the answer he wanted.
He wanted to know how I could not feel guilty. I told him of insulating one of
two nearly identical houses built side by side. We insulated the walls of one
with 1.25 inches of urethane. The other house was insulated with full thick
fiberglass batts put in place by a reputable installer. Not only did we use only
1.25 inches of urethane as the total wall insulation, but we had the builder
leave off the insulated sheathing. At the end of the first winter, the urethane
insulated home had a heating bill half of their neighbor's. I know that is not
terribly scientific, but it is very real. I am not sure he was convinced, but it
should be noted that same company jumped into the urethane foam supply business
the next year.
One
and a quarter inch of polyurethane sprayed properly in the wall of a house will
prevent more heat loss than all the fiber insulation that can be crammed in the
walls -- even up to an eight inch thickness. Not only does it provide better
insulation, but it provides significant additional strength to the
house.
One of
my early clients was Brent. I had insulated several potato storages for Brent.
He knew what spray-in-place urethane insulation could do. When he decided to
build his new, very large, very fancy new home, he asked me to come insulate it.
I told him I would be delighted. The builder pitched a fit. He "didn't need any
of that spray-in-place urethane in his buildings. He made his buildings tight,
and fiberglass was just as good."
Brent
explained to the builder, "I know who is going to insulate the building. It is
not as definite as to who is going to be the contractor. You can make up your
mind. We are going to have the urethane insulation and you build the building,
or we are going to have the urethane insulation, and I will have someone else
build the building." It didn't take the contractor long to decide he wanted to
use urethane insulation.
With the lowest
k-factor and the highest R-value, urethane foam can provide more thermal
resistance with less material than any other insulation.
|